In the 19th century, publication of the descriptions and studies of Armenian manuscripts began through the manuscript catalogues and the publication of articles in Armenian periodicals. The lengthiest Armenian periodical the “Bazmavep” (Venice, since 1843) also dedicated considerable space to the presentation of Armenian manuscripts.The early articles of the 19th century by authors Garegin Zarbhanalyan and Ghevond Alishan signify the role of Armenian manuscripts in Armenian culture and history, speak about the significance of their preservation and presentation in the journals. Later articles by Barsegh Sargisyan present the select manuscripts from the Mekhitarist Congregation. In the 19th century the “Bazmavep” served as a primary vehicle for the popularization of the Mekhitarist Congregation’s manuscripts. Additionally, the “Bazmavep” not only facilitated the circulation of scholarly information about the manuscripts of the Mekhitarist Congregation but also presented manuscripts from the Royal Library of Berlin. The “Bazmavep” played a significant role in the dissemination of scholarly discourse by directly responding to articles from other Armenological journals or simply reprinting information about Armenian manuscripts published elsewhere.For contemporary scholars, these articles serve the enrichment of understanding the dissemination of scholarly discourse on the Armenian manuscripts in the 19th century. Furthermore, they offer valuable information about the locations of manuscripts at specific times, and shed light on incomplete or unreleased initiatives related to manuscripts.

KeywordsBazmavep Armenian manuscripts Armenian periodicals descriptions of manuscripts Ghevond Alishan analysis of articles the Mekhitarist Congregation

The Armistice of Mudros, signed on October 30, 1918, provided an opportunity for Armenian intellectuals who had survived the Genocide to publish periodicals in Constantinople. Among these publications was the highly regarded daily newspaper “Chakatamart”. The newspaper addressed various issues concerning the Armenian people, including the internal and external political challenges faced by the First Republic of Armenia. One of its key areas of focus was the fundamental problems in the educational and cultural sectors. “Chakatamart” covered these topics through news reports prepared by its own correspondents, interviews, and reprints from newspapers published in Armenia. The articles were objective and impartial, while its analytical pieces stood out for their optimism and offered solutions to the problems in the fields of education and culture. The newspaper presented these issues in a positive light and generally approached the shortcomings and deficiencies in the government's work with leniency, attributing them to the evolving circumstances of the Armenian Question. Almost every issue of the “Chakatamart” periodical included publications related to the restoration and reopening of Armenian educational institutions and cultural centers.

KeywordsMudros Armistice Armenian Question Armenian Periodicals in Constantinople First Republic of Armenia “Chakatamart” Daily Newspaper Educational and Cultural Issues “Life in Armenia” Section.